Wednesday

Standing in Solidarity: Considering the Case of Larycia Hawkins

Photos of Larycia Hawkins wearing her headscarf via Facebook

News headlines today in Chicagoland are featuring my own beloved Wheaton College and their decision to suspend (or place on "administrative leave") one of the their professors who made some controversial theological statements in a recent public announcement that she would wear a hijab during advent in solidarity with Muslim women.  Here is the story as reported in the Chicagoist today.

In the interest of full disclosure, let me remind you that I am a graduate of Wheaton but I don't know Dr. Larycia Hawkins and have never met her.  Her original Facebook post that has generated so much controversy can be read here.  Let me make a few observations:

1. Standing in solidarity is good -- Hawkins cites a popular YouTube video, "Women Wear Hijabs for a Day," in the comments of her post suggesting that the video played a role in inspiring her decision to wear a hijab during Advent.  Take a look:



I have nothing but respect for the desire to stand in solidarity with Muslim women in this way.  My wife and both former and current teammates of mine have done so on multiple occasions.  I, myself, have had similar experiences in what may be called "cross-cultural dressing" and can testify that it can be done in a way that is respectful, appreciated by the "other", and enlightening.  Given the fact that Christ himself engaged in a kind of cross-cultural dressing (enfleshening) in his Incarnation, Advent seems to be an especially appropriate time for something like this.

2. The time is right for Christ followers to stand in solidarity with Muslims -- I don't need to remind you that we are living in a time when hatred toward Muslims is en vogue.  From the typically leftist Rob Lowe:
To the famous Trump vow to block all Muslims from entering the United States, it has become way too acceptable to be anti-Muslim.  When followers of Jesus stand in solidarity and express their love and welcome for Muslims, this is a good thing that should be respected and imitated.  My friend, Justin Long, has provided a really excellent article on why we should love Muslims and extend hospitality to them (especially to migrants).

3. Dr. Hawkins confused the issue by packing some muddy missiology into it.  In my opinion, Dr. Hawkins should have made this about solidarity with Muslim women and left it there.  Instead, she inserted questions about theology/missiology that made it very difficult for the Wheaton College administration.  By declaring that Muslims and Christians worship the same God, she was taking a position that certainly can be defended but is nevertheless easy to misunderstand.  I have spent a lot of time in those missiological waters and I know enough about them to make me want to ask the professor exactly what she means by that.  Indeed if one of my own staff members made a similar public statement without a careful explanation, I might have to take a very similar course of action as the college.  To be sure, there is a sense in which her statement (and Pope Francis' statement) is true, but there is also a very real sense in which it is false.  Let's put it this way: Do Muslims worship the God of Abraham? They would say yes.  Do Muslims worship Jesus who is the God of Abraham?  They would say no.  Islam wholeheartedly rejects the divinity of Christ and the triunity of God even while affirming the spiritual heritage of Abraham, Isaac, Jabob, and Moses.  If someone asks if Muslims and Christians worship the same God, the only reasonable answer is, "it's complicated."

My point is that this is muddy water.  Followers of Jesus should spend time in such waters, but bringing that mud into a question about love and solidarity is unnecessary and unhelpful.  I don't blame Dr. Hawkins for being a bit out of her depth here (she is a highly accomplished political scientist and not a missiologist), but it is also difficult for me to blame the college for the steps they have taken.

I hope that Dr. Hawkins will have the opportunity to clarify herself on this point and that Wheaton will reinstate her and affirm her call for solidarity.  I myself affirm it with the reservations I've mentioned above.


17 comments:

  1. Well articulated, brother. I've been exploring this story and mulling over the complexities surrounding it all day. Your points summarize what I've been processing personally. Thanks for your thoughts and much love.

    Scott

    ReplyDelete
  2. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Nicely reasoned and nuanced--helpful piece; thank you (Wheaton MA '06 here).

    One important correction to suggest: Wheaton College says they did NOT, as you put it, "suspend (or place on "administrative leave") one of the their professors for wearing a hijab". See the recent statements by the College, including "The College has no stated position on the wearing of headscarves as a gesture of care and concern for those in Muslim or other religious communities that may face discrimination or persecution. We support the protection of all Americans including the right to the free exercise of religion, as guaranteed by the Constitution of the United States."

    Rather, the College says Dr. Hawkins is on administrative leave because of questions about her theological views implied by her public statements: "In response to significant questions regarding the theological implications of statements that Associate Professor of Political Science Dr. Larycia Hawkins has made about the relationship of Christianity to Islam, Wheaton College has placed her on administrative leave, pending the full review to which she is entitled as a tenured faculty member."

    (Above citations from the Wheaton College Media Center page here:
    http://www.wheaton.edu/Media-Center/Media-Relations/Statements/Wheaton-College-Statement-Regarding-Christian-Engagement-with-Muslim-Neighbors )

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Ah, yes, I see where I was not clear. Let me correct it. Thanks!

      Delete
  4. The God of Abraham is Jesus. It's not complicated. Jesus Christ same yesterday, today and forever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you Brad...... sometimes things can be simple. Sooner or later you have to pick a side people.

      Delete
    2. A side? Jeez... Thanks Mr. Trump, for stopping by. Sorry for the nuance, I know that's lost on you.

      Delete
    3. A side? Jeez... Thanks Mr. Trump, for stopping by. Sorry for the nuance, I know that's lost on you.

      Delete
  5. The God of Abraham is Jesus. It's not complicated. Jesus Christ same yesterday, today and forever.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't understand the point you are trying to make.

      Delete
    2. You said about Muslims and Christians worship same God it was com0licated. If I'm correct. I don't see it being that complicated to decide. The Bible is clear on God's nature and attributes, the Koran is clear on Allah. So why is it complicated?

      Delete
    3. I did? Are you sure that I said that? Nuance, brother.

      Delete
  6. Cody, thanks for your thoughts. Good stuff, and even stronger backbone to wade in and help remind us that while, ontologically, this question is simple, epistemologically, it's complex. Have you read Tennent's chapter on this? Really good stuff.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thanks, Justin. I don't think I've read Tennent on this, but I may have. It's been a while since I've read anything by him.

      Delete
  7. While the origin is the same with Abraham, the 2 religions diverge. Our God is the triune God, where Jesus is an integral part. Jesus is not related to Allah. If that is the case, how can Allah be the same person as our God the Father? Seems pretty clear to me from that perspective. But I do appreciate your sensitivity and the "its complicated" perspective that you raise... Thanks from a first semester Wheaton Dad.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I said most of what you just said didn't I? Muslims hold to the spiritual heritage of Abraham. But that Muslims deny the trinity and the divinity of Christ.

      "Jesus is not related to Allah" is a difficult sentence. "Allah" is simply the Arabic word for God and all Arab Christians use the word. I believe your sentence reflects a rather narrow, English-centric worldview. Let me suggest instead that "Jesus is not the same as the God of Islam". This is stronger ground.

      "How can Allah be the same person as God the Father" is also a troubled sentence. It confuses categories of person and being and suggests that your own trinitarianism is a little less than robust. The comparison is between the God of the Qu'ran and the God of the Bible -- not between Allah and the Father. That doesn't make sense.

      So, you can see, it really wasn't clear to you. It is complicated. And truly there is no way to hold forth the uniqueness and exclusivity of the Lord Jesus with boldness and clarity towards Muslims without appreciating these complexities.

      Delete