I think I've mentioned before that I liked what the Cape Town Commitment had to say about contextualization. In particular, it has defined "insider movements" in a way that is very helpful as you will see below.
A couple important notes on that.
First, IMs are not just something that is the domain of the Muslim world. I praise God for this clarification, because the debate/discussion surrounding contextualization is clouded by it being too associated with Islam and reaching Muslims. There is just much more to it than that. Critics of insider movements often make the mistake of painting them all with the same brush as if all IMs were in the context of Islam and as if they all looked the same and agreed on the same points.
Second, it defines IMs as missional communities of Christ-followers who seek to obey the Bible. Thus, a so-called IM that isn't following Jesus, seeking to obey Scripture, or seeking to engage its cultural context isn't really what we are talking about.
In this way, the gauntlet is sort of laid out for those who have been so adamant in their opposition to IMs. James White is one of my favorite persons who has spoken out against them. And I mean that. I repost lots of stuff from James and rarely miss his podcasts. However, his blanket condemnations of IMs are, I think, unfair and unhelpful. I would ask Dr. White to consider the CTC definition below and explain what exactly he opposes. It isn't the Christ-following, small groups, or Bible focus. So it would have to be the continuing connections to birth communities and the idea of maintaining certain religious observances. Well, it is one thing to oppose the holding over of particular, named observances. It is quite another to throw all IMs under the bus. White ignores the possibility that there exist insider movements who are genuine, theologically orthodox, Christ-followers seeking to obey the Bible and reach their kinsmen. He ignores the fact that these people are often persecuted just as much as those do not pursue contextualization. So, not that James would likely read this, but I would ask that he pull back a bit on his broad condemnation of IMs.
Tomorrow, I will post the CTC statement in its entirety and tell you another reason why I think it is a good thing.
- Cody on Instagram
- Cody on Twitter
- Cody on Pinterest
- Cody on Facebook
- Cody's Speaking/Travel
- Trinity International
- Hindus & Yeshu Bhaktas (येशु भक्त)
- Diaspora Missiology
- Partnership Opportunities
- Lausanne Global Conversation
- Global Diaspora Network
- Endiro Coffee
- Goh Bright Future
- Move In
This Month's Best
Of late, I've been trying to consume more classic literature. I'm working through several pieces now and hope that as I complete th...
Photo by Eric Parker Here's a great post from over at the Ms. Blog Magazine by Jewel Woods. I'm not familiar with Woods or th...
By © Salim Photography/ www.salimphoto.com The following comes from David Bosch's Transforming Mission . Usually, I post extended ...
Photo by Asian Development Bank Let's pick up again on our missiological musings of coffee and missions in the 21st century. [ Ca...
I like to compile definitions of familiar terms from looking at the whole of Scripture. I often find myself doing this when teaching the Bi...